TRENDS IN THE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE ON THE LEAGILE SUPPLY CHAIN: BIBLIOMETRIC AND CITATION CONTEXT ANALYSES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37569/DalatUniversity.13.4S.1222(2023)Keywords:
Bibliometric, Leagile, Scopus, Supply chain, Systematic review.Abstract
Leagile is a hybrid of conventional lean and agile approaches intended to eliminate specific constraints and capacity limitations and enable agility in highly competitive business environments. Interest in incorporating lean and agile into the supply chain has grown in recent years, as shown by the growing number of scientific publications on this topic. This topic has garnered significant interest across a wide range of academic disciplines; however, a comprehensive study of the literature in this field has not yet been conducted. Therefore, the present study aims to provide a state-of-the-art summary of leagile supply chain issues that concern researchers. To do so, we use a bibliometric method, combined with citation context analysis, to evaluate data extracted from Scopus peer-reviewed articles published between 1999 and March 2023. Data analytic techniques, including citation analysis, co-citation analysis, and co-word (co-occurrence) analysis, are used. Using rigorous bibliometric and visualization tools, the results show the current status of the research problem, its impact, and suggestions for future work to address research gaps, such as a problem in an area of research that has been answered incompletely or insufficiently. The findings suggest that researchers in unexplored research areas in the ASEAN region include green supply chain strategies, supply chain risk management influenced by lean and agile strategies, and comparative analyses among ASEAN countries. These areas offer promising avenues for future research, contributing to regional competitiveness and performance enhancement.
Downloads
References
Abdullah & Khan, M. N. (2021). Determining mobile payment adoption: A systematic literature search and bibliometric analysis. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1893245. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1893245.
Agarwal, A., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2006). Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 173(1), 211-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.12.005
Agrawal, R., Majumdar, A., Majumdar, K., Raut, R. D., & Narkhede, B. E. (2022). Attaining sustainable development goals (SDGs) through supply chain practices and business strategies: A systematic review with bibliometric and network analyses. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3669-3687. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3057
Al-Khoury, A., Hussein, S. A., Abdulwhab, M., Aljuboori, Z. M., Haddad, H., Ali, M. A., Abed, I. A., & Flayyih, H. H. (2022). Intellectual capital history and trends: A bibliometric analysis using the Scopus database. Sustainability, 14(18), 11615. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811615
Ariadi, G., Surachman, Sumiati, & Rohman, F. (2021). The effect of lean and agile supply chain strategy on financial performance with mediating of strategic supplier integration & strategic customer integration: Evidence from bottled drinking-water industry in Indonesia. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1930500. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1930500.
Browning, T. R. (2000). Value-based product development: Refocusing lean. Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Engineering Management Society, EMS–2000, Albuquerque, NM, USA (pp. 168-172). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMS.2000.872495
Bruce, M., Daly, L., & Towers, N. (2004). Lean or agile: A solution for supply chain management in the textiles and clothing industry? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(2), 151-170. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570410514867.
Carvalho, H., Azevedo, S., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2013). Trade-offs among lean, agile, resilient, and green paradigms in supply chain management: A case study approach. In J. Xu, J. A. Fry, B. Lev, & A. Hajiyev (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering (Vol. 242) (pp. 953-968). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40081-0_81.
Carvalho, H., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2011). Integrating lean, agile, resilience, and green paradigms in supply chain management (LARG_SCM). In L. Pengzhong (Ed.), Supply Chain Management (pp. 27-48). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/14592
Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809-1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
Francis, M., Fisher, R., Thomas, A., & Rowlands, H. (2014). The meaning of ‘value’ in purchasing, logistics and operations management. International Journal of Production Research, 52(22), 6576-6589. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.903349
Harland, C. M. (1997). Supply chain operational performance roles. Integrated Management Systems, 8(2), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/09576069710165756
Khamsi, R. (2020). Coronavirus in context: Scite.ai tracks positive and negative citations for COVID-19 literature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01324-6
Kisperska-Moron, D., & de Haan, J. (2011). Improving supply chain performance to satisfy final customers: “leagile” experiences of a Polish distributor. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(1), 127-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.12.013
Kumar, M., Garg, D., & Agarwal, A. (2019). An analysis of inventory attributes in leagile supply chain: Cause and effect analysis. International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, 4(4), 870-881. https://doi.org/10.33889/ijmems.2019.4.4-069.
Martin, C., & Towill, D. R. (2000). Supply chain migration from lean and functional to agile and customized. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 5(4), 206-213. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540010347334.
Mason-Jones, R., Naylor, B., & Towill, D. R. (2000). Lean, agile or leagile? Matching your supply chain to the marketplace. International Journal of Production Research, 38(17), 4061-4070. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540050204920.
Metternich, J., Böllhoff, J., Seifermann, S., & Beck, S. (2013). Volume and mix flexibility evaluation of lean production systems. Procedia CIRP, 9, 79-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.172.
Mukherjee, D., Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2022). Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research, 148, 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042.
Naylor, J. B., Naim, M. M., & Berry, D. (1999). Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1-2), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-5273(98)00223-0.
Pham, D. T., & Thomas, A. J. (2011). Fit manufacturing: A framework for sustainability. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 23(1), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410381211196311.
Rachid, B. (2017). Supply chain improvement in LARG (Lean, Agile, Resilient, Green) context: A risk management approach. 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Logistics and Transport (ICALT), Bali, Indonesia (pp. 212-220). https://doi.org/10.1109/icadlt.2017.8547021
Rahimi, A., & Alemtabriz, A. (2022). Providing a model of leagile hybrid paradigm practices and its impact on supply chain performance. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 13(6), 1308-1345. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlss-04-2021-0073.
Rahiminezhad Galankashi, M., & Helmi, S. A. (2016). Assessment of hybrid lean-agile (leagile) supply chain strategies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 27(4), 470-482. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-08-2015-0069.
Salleh, N. H. M., Abd Rasidi, N. A. S., & Jeevan, J. (2020). Lean, agile, resilience and green (LARG) paradigm in supply chain operations: A trial in a seaport system. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, 12(4), 200-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2020.1833273.
Secchi, R., & Camuffo, A. (2019). Lean implementation failures: The role of organizational ambidexterity. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.007.
Seuring, S., & Gold, S. (2012). Conducting content‐analysis based literature reviews in supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 544-555. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211258609.
Shafiq, M., & Soratana, K. (2019). Lean and agile paradigms in humanitarian organizations? Logistics and supply chain management. Logforum-Scientific Journal of Logistics, 15(1), 139-153. https://doi.org/10.17270/j.log.2019.294.
Sukwadi, R., Wee, H.-M., & Yang, C.-C. (2013). Supply chain performance based on the lean-agile operations and supplier-firm partnership: An empirical study on the garment industry in Indonesia. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(2), 297-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12016.
Waqas, M., Honggang, X., Ahmad, N., Khan, S. A. R., Ullah, Z., & Iqbal, M. (2022). Triggering sustainable firm performance, supply chain competitive advantage, and green innovation through lean, green, and agile supply chain practices. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(12), 17832-17853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16707-z.
Yadav, A. K., & Kumar, D. (2022). A fuzzy decision framework of lean-agile-green (LAG) practices for sustainable vaccine supply chain. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(7), 1987-2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2021-0590.
Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2015). Foundations of citation analysis. In G. Marchionini (Ed.), Analysis and visualization of citation networks (pp. 1-20). Morgan & Claypool. https://doi.org/10.2200/s00624ed1v01y201501icr039.
Zimmermann, R., Ferreira, L. M. D. F., & Moreira, A. C. (2020). An empirical analysis of the relationship between supply chain strategies, product characteristics, environmental uncertainty and performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(3), 375-391. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-02-2019-0049.
Downloads
Published
Volume and Issues
Section
Copyright & License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ton Nguyen Trong Hien

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.