ANALYSIS OF FACTORS AFFECTING THE REPAYMENT CAPACITY OF REAL-ESTATE BUSINESSES LISTED ON HOCHIMINH STOCK EXCHANGE (HOSE)

Authors

  • Nguyễn Văn Thép The College of Economics, Cantho University, Viet Nam
  • Tạ Quang Dũng The College of Economics, Cantho University, Viet Nam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37569/DalatUniversity.8.1S.452(2018)

Keywords:

Equity, Inflation, Real estate businesses, Repayment capacity.

Abstract

The study aims to help real-estate businesses improve their repayment capacity. This study utilized panel data of real-estate businesses listed on Hochiminh Stock Exchange (HOSE) in the period of 2011-2015. To help these businesses improve the repayment capacity, the author analyzed the factors that affect repayment capacity. Accordingly, the random effects model (REM) is appropriate to analyze the factors that affect the repayment capacity of real-estate businesses listed on HOSE. In particular, factors such as return on assets (ROA) and asset turnover (SOA) have positive impacts on the repayment capacity, while return on equity (ROE), debt on assets ratio (DOA), and inflation (CPI) have negative impacts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. Journal of Finance, 23, 189-209.

Altman, E. I., & Sabato, G. (2007). Modeling credit risk for SMEs: Evidence from the US market. ABACUS Journal, 43(3), 332-357.

Beaver, W. H. (1966). Financial ratios as predictors of failure. Journal of Accounting Research, 4, 71-111.

Đinh, C. K. (2015). Dữ liệu bảng. Được truy lục từ http://www.fetp.edu.vn/cache/MPP7-523-OM04V-Du%20lieu%20bang--Dinh20Cong%20Khai_Data%204_Code-2015-05-05-14322452.pdf.

Fitzpatrick, P. (1931). Symptoms of industrial failure. Washington D.C, USA: Catholic University of America Press.

Hoàng, T. (2011). Phân tích rủi ro tín dụng doanh nghiệp bằng mô hình Logistic. Tạp chí Khoa học và Công nghệ, (43), 193-199.

Hol, S., Westgaard, S., & Wijst, N. V. D. (2002). Capital structure and the prediction of bankruptcy. Gjøvik, Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Retrieved from http://www.textbiz.org/projects/defaultprediction/capitalstructureandbankruptcy.pdf.

Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: A correction. The American Economic Review, 53(3), 433-443.

Ninua, I. (2008). Does a collateralized loan have a higher probability to default? Retrieved from http://docplayer.net/10112385-International-school-of-economics-at-tbilisi-state-university-does-a-collateralized-loan-have-a-higher-probability-to-default.html.

Pederzoli, C., & Torricelli, C. (2010). A parsimonious default prediction model for Italian SMEs. Banks and Bank Systems, 5(4), 5-9.

Qu, Y. (2006). Macroeconomic factors and probability of default. (Master thesis), The Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden. Retrieved from http://arc.hhs.se/download.aspx? MediumId=212.

Westgaard, S., & Wijst, N. (2000). Default probabilities in a corporate bank portfolio: A logistic model approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 135(2), 338-349.

Published

10-04-2018

Volume and Issues

Section

Economics and Management

How to Cite

Thép, N. V., & Dũng, T. Q. (2018). ANALYSIS OF FACTORS AFFECTING THE REPAYMENT CAPACITY OF REAL-ESTATE BUSINESSES LISTED ON HOCHIMINH STOCK EXCHANGE (HOSE). Dalat University Journal of Science, 8(1S), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.37569/DalatUniversity.8.1S.452(2018)