• Nguyễn Thanh Hồng Ân Dalat University, Viet Nam
  • Hoàng Mai Phương Dalat University, Viet Nam




Cash holdings, Free cash flow theory, Pecking order theory, Trade-off theory, Vietnamese listed companies.


This research aims at exploring the current state and the reasons for holding cash of Vietnamese firms. Using a dataset of 199 companies listed on the Ho Chi Minh City Stock Exchange in the period from 2011 to 2018, statistical analyses indicate that the median level of cash holding by net assets of Vietnamese firms is about 5.9%, which is lower than firms in many countries in the region. High levels of cash holding only appear among small firms. In addition, the cash holding ratios of firms in all four size quantiles have shrunk since 2016, especially for firms in the smallest size quantile. Regression results show that Vietnamese firms tend to hoard cash when business conditions improve, when they have low growth opportunities, or when business risks increase. On the other hand, Vietnamese firms tend to reduce holding cash when other internal sources of cash substitutes are in abundance or when external fund accessibility improves. These characteristics support the trade-off theory of cash holding, meaning that Vietnamese firms hold cash mainly for transactional and precautionary purposes. Additional analyses show that the rate of adjustment of cash holding toward the target level is about 30% a year. Taken together, the results confirm the hypothesis that Vietnamese firms hold cash for transactional and precautionary purposes, and they constantly reconsider the benefits and costs of adjusting cash holding ratios to the target levels. The research results have two main implications. Firstly, the fact that firms with low growth opportunities have higher cash holding ratios indicates that these firms’ board of directors may have been inefficient in monitoring and disciplining the behavior of firms’ executives toward shareholder interests. Secondly, the fact that Vietnamese firms have low and dwindling cash holdings in recent years and use their cash stock mainly for transactional and precautionary purposes may be a sign of internal resource deficiency. Given that internal resources are vital to investments in research and development, which in turn contribute to firms’ future growth and competitiveness, the current low level cash holding is a bad sign for the future growth as well as the long-term competitiveness of Vietnamese firms.


Download data is not yet available.


Acharya, V. V., Almeida, H., & Campello, M. (2007). Is cash negative debt? A hedging perspective on corporate financial policies. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 16(4), 515-554.

Almeida, H., Campello, M., & Weisbach, M. S. (2004). The cash flow sensitivity of cash. Journal of Finance, 59(4), 1777-1803.

Arellano, M. (1987). Computing robust standard errors for within-groups estimators. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 49(4), 431-434.

Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297.

Bates, T. W., Kahle, K. M., & Stulz, R. M. (2009). Why do U.S. firms hold so much more cash than they used to? Journal of Finance, 64(5), 1985-2021.

Baumol, W. J. (1952). The transactions demand for cash: An inventory theoretic approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 66(4), 545-556.

Chen, Y., Dou, P. Y., Rhee, S. G., Truong, C., & Veeraraghavan, M. (2015). National culture and corporate cash holding around the world. Journal of Banking and Finance, 50(1), 1-18.

Dittmar, A., Mahrt, S. J., & Servaes, H. (2003). International corporate governance and corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1), 111-133.

Faulkender, M. (2002). Cash holdings among small businesses. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=305179.

Fazzari, S. M., Hubbard, G. R., & Petersen, B. C. (1988). Financial constraints and corporate investment. Brooking Papers on Economic Activities, 1988(1), 141-206.

Ferreira, M. A., & Vilela, A. S. (2004). Why do firms hold cash? Evidence from EMU countries. European Financial Management, 10(2), 295-319.

Harford, J. (1999). Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 54(6), 1969-1997.

Harford, J., Mansi, S. A., & Maxwell, W. F. (2008). Corporate governance and firm cash holdings in the US. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(3), 535-555.

Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest, and money. London, UK: Macmillan and Co. Limited Publishing.

Kinh, K. (2018). "Đau đầu" vì nhiều tiền: Chân dung những doanh nghiệp đang nắm giữ lượng tiền mặt lên tới cả chục nghìn tỷ. Retrieved from http://cafef.vn/dau-dau-vi-nhieu-tien-chan-dung-nhung-doanh-nghiep-dang-nam-giu-luong-tien-mat-len-toi-ca-chuc-nghin-ty-20180220093509968.chn.

Lintner, J. (1956). Distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends, retained earnings, and taxes. The American Economic Review, 46(2), 97-113.

Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. Journal of Finance, 60(6), 2661-2700.

Miller, M. H., & Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. The Journal of Business, 34(4), 411-433.

Miller, M. H., & Orr, D. (1966). A model of the demand for money by firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(3), 413-435.

Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporate finance, and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297.

Myers, S., & Majluf, N. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187-221.

Nguyen, T. H. A., & Nguyen, V. T. (2018a). Free cash flow and corporate profitability in emerging economies: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Economics Bulletin, 38(1), 211-220.

Nguyen, T. H. A., & Nguyen, V. T. (2018b). Working capital management and corporate profitability: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Foundations of Management, 10, 195-206.

Nguyễn, T. U. U., & Từ, T. K. T. (2015). Ảnh hưởng của việc nắm giữ tiền mặt vượt trội đến các quyết định tài chính của các doanh nghiệp Việt Nam. Tạp chí Phát triển và Hội nhập, 25(35), 36-45.

Nguyễn, T. U. U., & Từ, T. K. T. (2017). Ảnh hưởng của dòng tiền đến độ nhạy cảm tiền mặt nắm giữ trong điều kiện hạn chế tài chính của các công ty Việt Nam. Tạp chí Phát triển Kinh tế, 28(11), 26-53.

Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica, 49(6), 1417-1426.

Okzan, A., & Okzan, N. (2004). Corporate cash holdings: An empirical investigation of UK companies. Journal of Banking and Finance, 28(9), 2103-2134.

Opler, T., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R. M., & Williamson, R. (1999). The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 52(1), 3-46.

Orlova, S. V., & Rao, R. P. (2018). Cash holdings speed of adjustment. International Review of Economics and Finance, 54(C), 1-14.

Phạm, H., & Đinh, P. Q. T. (2018). Ảnh hưởng hạn chế tài chính đến quyết định nắm giữ tiền mặt của các doanh nghiệp niêm yết tại Việt Nam. Journal of Science Ho Chi Minh City Open University, 60(3), 133-143.




Volume and Issues


Economics and Management

How to Cite

Ân, N. T. H., & Phương, H. M. (2020). WHY DO VIETNAMESE FIRMS HOLD CASH?. Dalat University Journal of Science, 10(4), 3-31. https://doi.org/10.37569/DalatUniversity.10.4.606(2020)